Private RAG
Exploring how source selection and answer generation should be examined separately.
Explore the reference work ↗Our work
Work you can examine.
A worked example, reference architecture and exploratory concepts. The status of each is stated so you can judge what the material actually demonstrates.
Start with the method
Inspect an answer review.
Our worked example shows an invented policy, questions, deliberately authored answers and the reasons for each judgment. The worksheet is available to download.
It demonstrates a review method. It is not a client case, a model benchmark or evidence of a deployed system.
Open the worked example ↗
Sentinel
Investigating how evidence and procedure context could support a laboratory incident reviewer.
Read the research question ↗EvidenceDesk
An interface concept for examining answer claims beside their supporting material.
Read the concept ↗ClinicFlow is an archived proof of concept. See the archive note.
Questions still being shaped.
Our quantum computing direction is at exploration and proposal stage. Scheduling and resource allocation are possible starting points; no project has been selected or run, and no funding award or validated result is claimed.
When measured work is published, its task, baseline, sample and limitations should be visible. An attractive interface alone is not evidence that a method is useful.
For a question in your own organisation, explore AI Research & Feasibility, AI Proof of Concept or Model Evaluation & Benchmarking.